Ex-POW Jessica Lynch recalls Iraq, those fighting for us every day |

Ex-POW Jessica Lynch recalls Iraq, those fighting for us every day

Jessica Lynch still has nightmares, and her body still aches from wounds she suffered seven years ago as a prisoner of war in Iraq.

Yet despite the constant reminders, even she sometimes forgets about the thousands of American soldiers risking everything overseas.

“They’re fighting for us — right this minute,” Lynch said Sunday during an Armed Forces Day event in North Allegheny Senior High School in McCandless.

“Never forget our brave men and women fighting for us,” she said.

Lynch spoke during “An Armed Forces Salute and Concert” to raise money for the Fisher House Foundation, which provides housing to families of hospitalized service members.

The Army private fell into enemy hands March 23, 2003, when her unit, the 507th Maintenance Company, was ambushed. Eleven soldiers died in the attack, and six were taken prisoner.

U.S. special operations forces rescued Lynch, then 19, on April 1, 2003, from a hospital in Nasiriyah, Iraq. She was flown to a hospital in Germany, where doctors treated her for spinal injuries, fractured bones and other internal injuries.

1st Lt. Brian Radford, a North Allegheny graduate, met Lynch yesterday for the first time since he participated in the rescue mission.

Several hundred people, including dozens of veterans, attended the event, which featured patriotic music performed by the Allegheny Brass Band and North Hills Harmony Line Chorus & 3 Rivers 4 Quartet.

Lynch of Palestine, W.Va., has a 3-year-old daughter and is studying at West Virginia University to become a kindergarten teacher.

She said she tries but fails to block the terrible memories of her capture in Iraq.

“It’s constant,” she said. “Even though I like to push it back and forget, it’s always there. … You just roll with it. After seven years, you learn to cope.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.