ShareThis Page
Ex-secretary rejects plea deal, will head to court |

Ex-secretary rejects plea deal, will head to court

| Thursday, November 9, 2006 12:00 a.m

A former Fayette County secretary accused of stealing almost $47,000 from the office of District Judge Robert W. Breakiron declined a plea agreement Wednesday, opting to have the case heard by a jury.

Barbara S. Shaffer, 51, of Dunbar, pleaded not guilty in June to 81 counts each of tampering with public records and obstructing the administration of law, as well as a count each of theft by unlawful taking and theft by failure to make required disposition of funds.

Standing before Judge Steve P. Leskinen yesterday in Fayette County Court, Shaffer said she would not accept the plea agreement offered by District Attorney Nancy Vernon. The details of the proposed deal were not available.

Shaffer will be placed back on the November trial list, Leskinen said.

Breakiron has testified that he began looking into bank statements after the county’s Clerk of Courts Office said it received a bounced check from the magisterial office.

The state Auditor General’s Office discovered $46,858 missing from the district judge’s account after completing a 10-month audit of office records from January 2002 to February 2005.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.