Archive

ShareThis Page
Ex-Tennessee consumer protection official arrested in telemarketing scheme | TribLIVE.com
News

Ex-Tennessee consumer protection official arrested in telemarketing scheme

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, June 9, 2015 6:35 p.m.

An attorney who formerly handled consumer complaints for the Tennessee Attorney General’s Office ran a telemarketing scheme that stole thousands of peoples’ identities and siphoned millions of dollars into a Huntington National Bank account in Pittsburgh, according to Pittsburgh federal court documents.

The case was unsealed Tuesday following the arrest of Glenn Erikson, 49, of Tampa, Fla. There was no attorney listed for Erikson in court documents.

Erikson, who also goes by the last name Aaronson, had telemarketers claim to be employees of Medicare or another medical insurer, FBI Special Agent Sean Langford says in the affidavit for Erikson’s arrest.

“The caller would then convince the victim that the victim had to provide the caller with certain information relating to the victim’s bank account, or some negative result would occur,” Langford said.

Erikson then had an amount ranging from $379 to $446.91 withdrawn from the victim’s bank account, he said. He targeted people across the country in the scam, Langford said.

He told the bank as well as several legitimate businesses he ensnared in the scheme that he was selling identity theft protection and discount medical benefits products to the victims. Between March and May of 2013, he batch processed electronic “checks” that stole more than $3.3 million from victims’ accounts.

Huntington National Bank froze the account in May 2013 while investigating numerous consumer complaints about the withdrawals, Langford said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.