Ex-Turtle Creek man, 19, pleads guilty to federal drug, gun charges |

Ex-Turtle Creek man, 19, pleads guilty to federal drug, gun charges


A former Turtle Creek man will spend at least five years in prison after pleading guilty in federal court in Pittsburgh to drug and firearms charges, including having a loaded AR-15 rifle in the rear of the vehicle he was driving when North Versailles police stopped him last year.

William T. Spencer, 19, pleaded guilty Thursday to one count each of possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine and heroin, as well as a single count of firearms possession for furthering drug trafficking, the U.S. Attorney’s office in Pittsburgh said Friday.

Spencer was carrying a large amount of crack cocaine when North Versailles police stopped him on Feb. 11, 2017, while he was driving a sport utility vehicle. Police said he also had heroin inside the center console of the car. Police said they found a loaded Bushmaster AR-15 rifle and a loaded handgun in the SUV’s cargo area.

Spencer had been ordered to jail on March 31, 2017, according to court documents. He faces a mandated minimum five-year prison term and up to life in prison, a possible $2 million fine, or both. His actual sentence will be imposed by U.S. Judge David Cercone on Feb. 1, 2019.

The federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Drug Enforcement Agency and the North Versailles and Duquesne police departments assisted in the investigation.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.