ShareThis Page
Experienced Lions expecting more in 2002-03 |

Experienced Lions expecting more in 2002-03

| Friday, November 22, 2002 12:00 a.m

Penn State wrote off last season as a learning experience and a rebuilding year in what would turn out to be a 7-21 (3-13 Big Ten) season.

The Nittany Lions had lost four of their five starters and nearly 80 percent of their scoring from the 2000-01 team that had gone to the Sweet 16 of the NCAA Tournament.

The lack-of-experience excuse isn’t going to work this season. Though there are only two seniors on the team, forward Tyler Smith was the only starter and one of three players to graduate. Of the eight returners, only one did not average at least nine minutes per game.

Those that return have experienced the trials of the Big Ten and have seen what happens when they make mistakes. They have had all offseason to think about those things and how to get back to where they were two years ago.

“I certainly feel that you do learn an awful lot about yourself when you don’t have the success,” Penn State coach Jerry Dunn said. “This is a chance and an opportunity to get back to where we want to be. I think that is what has fueled the fire for our players during the course of the summer, also in the spring after last season and in our preseason.”

The Lions increased their emphasis on offseason weight training. Sophomore forward Jan Jagla, who led the team in rebounding with 5.8 a game, took it to heart. The 7-foot German native put on 15 pounds of muscle during the offseason. He currently weighs 231 pounds.

“As soon as the season was over, I just started lifting with the team and it really helped me a lot,” Jagla said. “Also, my diet changed a lot. I’m just eating as much as I can every time I go out and eat; maybe eating four or five times a day.”

The frontcourt has already taken a major hit, however, with the loss of Daren Tielsch. Tielsch, who averaged four points and 3.4 rebounds last season, left the team and withdrew from school to help his ill father, who recently suffered a heart attack. Junior Ndu Egekeze is the leading candidate to fill the other spot in the starting frontcourt.

The Lions’ backcourt returns intact. Senior point guard Brandon Watkins, who averaged 13.3 points and 4.1 assists last year, started stepping into his role as captain last season and seem to have embraced it thus far.

“My teammates know that I’ve been through a lot and they look up to me a lot as far as how to do drills,” Watkins said. “Whatever the case may be, I just know I have to lead by example, and I can’t jump down guys’ throats all of the time.”

Junior shooting guard Sharif Chambliss was last season’s most pleasant surprise for the Lions. He proved to be one of the most deadly 3-point shooters in the Big Ten. He finished fifth in the conference with a .421 shooting percentage and first with an average of 3.54 three-pointers a game. He also led the conference in free throw percentage, and finished 10th in scoring with a 14.6-point average.

The Lions will have the potential to have an effective three-guard lineup if junior swingman Jamaal Tate plays with the energy he showed as a substitute in 2001. Tate looked out of sync for most of last season after a preseason injury and averaged just 6.5 points in 25.8 minutes a game.

The Lions lost their opener, 85-55, to North Carolina in the Preseason NIT. Their next game is 7:30 p.m. Saturday against Pennsylvania at the Palestra in Philadelphia.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.