ShareThis Page
Experts: State’s turnpike corruption ‘the worst such case’ |

Experts: State’s turnpike corruption ‘the worst such case’

HARRISBURG — The Pennsylvania Turnpike scandal is the worst of its kind in the nation in recent history, experts say.

“There’s been nothing as systemic, as enduring and widespread,” Peter Samuel, publisher of in Frederick, Md., said of allegations in a state grand jury report last month.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane has said the investigation continues; the grand jury had concluded that eight people, including a former Senate Democratic leader and former top turnpike officials, used the agency as a “cash cow” to raise campaign money for lawmakers and gubernatorial candidates. Campaign donations and gifts paved the way for rigged turnpike contracts in a pay-to-play scheme, the grand jury said.

Such schemes have surfaced in other states, though usually not with toll road agencies, said Craig Holman, lobbyist for Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group in Washington.

“Fifteen states have pay-to-play laws,” Holman said, the strongest of which are in Illinois, New Jersey and Connecticut, which dealt with scandals.

These laws typically ban campaign donations from contractors at the start of negotiations or before, Holman said. Strict laws cover the company and senior executives.

“This situation in Pennsylvania makes Pennsylvania ripe for a pay-to-play law,” Holman said.

Gov. Tom Corbett would support such a law, given he has an executive order that does the same for agencies under his control, said his spokesman, Kevin Harley. The turnpike is one of several independent agencies. The next governor isn’t bound by Corbett’s executive orders.

Although the turnpike scandal is not an isolated incident at toll road agencies, others have been narrower in scope.

In Maine, the turnpike director last year went to prison for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars by using gift cards and credit cards for travel to resorts and plush accommodations. Paul Violette pleaded guilty to felony theft.

A lawsuit alleged that Violette used the cards for personal travel, hotel and meal expenses on trips in Maine, Florida, Bermuda, Canada, France, Puerto Rico, Spain and Italy, The Associated Press reported.

Pennsylvania’s corruption appears to be “the worst such case, of a large scale, over a long period of time,” said Robert Poole, transportation fellow at the Reason Foundation, a free-market think tank in Los Angeles. The grand jury report covered activities over a decade.

Turnpike spokesman Carl DeFebo said he had no comment. CEO Mark Compton has said he will try to change the culture of the agency.

Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, sentenced to 14 years in federal prison, tried to sell a Senate seat and to use the Illinois Tollway to extort money from contractors for campaign money, prosecutors said. Tollway officials were not implicated in the case against Blagojevich. He was considering the choice between a $1.8 billion and $5 billion road expansion program and, in meetings wired by federal agents, Blagojevich made it clear the $5 billion project would not go through if he didn’t get sufficient campaign money, reported.

A 50-page report in 2012 by the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Transportation on the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, which operates Dulles Toll Road, said the authority’s “weak policies and procedures led to questionable procurements and lacked overall accountability.”

Employees accepted gifts from contractors such as Super Bowl tickets, travel and accommodations, the report said. It cited instances in which non-public information went to potential contractors, giving them an edge. No one was charged.

This month, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported a federal investigation is under way of the Delaware River Port Authority, which operates four toll bridges and a commuter rail line, for its development spending. No one is accused of wrongdoing.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media’s state Capitol reporter. Reach him at 717-787-1405 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.