ShareThis Page
Eyewear deal fits Highmark’s strategy |

Eyewear deal fits Highmark’s strategy

| Wednesday, May 3, 2006 12:00 a.m

When Italy’s Luxottica, owner of American retail eyewear giants LensCrafters, Cole Vision and Pearle Vision, wouldn’t allow customers to use Highmark Inc.’s vision coverage, the Pittsburgh-based insurance giant took action.

Highmark decided to get into the retail eyewear business itself, paying $305 million for Luxottica competitor Eye Care Centers of America. Announced Monday, the deal is slated to close within six months. And Highmark becomes the nation’s third-largest retail eyewear chain.

“We’d been frozen out of Luxottica’s network,” Highmark CEO Ken Melani said yesterday. “The ECCA deal was just a continuation of what we’ve been doing the last three years.”

One thing Highmark has been doing is making money. In 2005, the insurer’s vision companies, United Concordia dental companies and its property and casualty insurance businesses combined for $70 million in net income, up 47 percent from 2004, and fully one-fifth of Highmark’s net income for the year.

“He’s been responsive to what the marketplace has needed, and he’s left no doubt that he wants to play in the national market,” David Lagnese, a benefits consultant in the Pittsburgh office of Towers Perrin, said of Melani’s actions.

In the three years since he assumed Highmark command from the 31st floor of Fifth Avenue Place, Downtown, Melani — trained as a physician — has aggressively sought and secured new ways to make money over and above just being an insurance company, remaining Western Pennsylvania’s dominant health insurer. Today, some 23 million individuals, one in 10 U.S. residents, are connected in some way to Highmark.

He’s put together a number of partnerships with other “Blues,” including Independence Blue Cross in Philadelphia, Northeastern Blue Cross in Wilkes-Barre, Louisiana Blue Cross and Blue Shield and Florida Blue Cross and Blue Shield. Partnerships can include packaging various insurance products the other Blues have no desire to develop expertise in.

United Concordia, Highmark’s nationwide dental insurance product, certainly is a revenue generator. The company in 2005 was awarded its third-consecutive five-year pact with the U.S. Department of Defense to administer a dental plan covering 1.7 million members that will add $2.6 billion to Highmark’s revenues. Total revenue in 2005 was $9.6 billion.

“While health insurance will continue to drive the company, it’s good to have these other well-performing products to fall back on when insurance has a down period,” said Tom Tomczyk, a health benefits consultant in the Pittsburgh office of Mercer Human Resource Consulting.

“If something becomes unprofitable, we have to get out — we can’t afford to stay with it,” Melani said. “Every day you’re examining your plan, looking at new products, new services.”

Unlike many competitors, Melani has refused to relocate operations overseas in a money-saving move. Some 11,000 of Highmark’s 12,700 employees are based in Pennsylvania.

“We will maintain our commitment to this community absolutely as long as we can,” he said.

While Melani emphasized Highmark’s long-standing mission to provide affordable care, the company makes money. Critics say a good chunk of that profit should be returned to members, but Melani said even if done, it only would be a one-time gift.

Being profitable allows Highmark to do other things, such as subsidize some of its coverages, offer its employees as volunteers for numerous community activities and be a strong supporter of various area projects.

“Highmark is the insurance carrier you love to hate,” Tomczyk said. “It does do a lot for the community, subsidizes some coverages. It’s not as much as some would like, but you can’t please everyone.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.