Fatal smoking possibly higher than originally thought |

Fatal smoking possibly higher than originally thought

The Los Angeles Times

The surgeon general says about 480,000 Americans die each year from smoking. But a new analysis suggests the true figure may be closer to 575,000.

The 21 causes of death that have been officially blamed on smoking accounted for 83 percent of the actual deaths among smokers who were tracked in a study published in the Thursday issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Additional diseases — including breast cancer, prostate cancer, hypertensive heart disease and renal failure — were responsible for most of the rest of the observed deaths. A very small number of deaths were because of things such as accidents and suicide, which have a more tenuous link to smoking.

Researchers from the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute and elsewhere combined data from five large, ongoing health studies: the Nurses’ Health Study I, the Women’s Health Initiative, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, the Cancer Prevention Study II and the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. The researchers included 954,029 men and women who were being tracked as of Jan. 1, 2000 and who had told interviewers about their smoking status.

Between 2000 and 2011, 16,475 (19 percenr) of the 88,616 smokers died, as did 108,253 (23 percent) of the 469,141 former smokers and 56,649 (14.3 percent) of the 396,272 people who had never smoked, according to the study.

Compared to the U.S. population as a whole, the people included in this study were more likely to be white and to be highly educated. That limits researchers’ ability to generalize the findings to the entire country.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.