ShareThis Page
Faulty cord blamed as fire kills 5 in Idaho |

Faulty cord blamed as fire kills 5 in Idaho

The Associated Press
| Saturday, April 13, 2013 9:12 p.m

BOISE — An extension cord hooked to an electric grill on a porch shorted and started a house fire that killed five people on Saturday morning, a northern Idaho fire official says.

Orofino fire Chief Mike Lee said the house was engulfed in flames when firefighters arrived after a neighbor reported the fire at 1:38 a.m.

Smoke inhalation likely killed the two adults and three teens whose bodies were badly burned in the blaze, Lee said. The dead were a family of four plus a teenage friend who was sleeping over to help celebrate a birthday, the chief said. He did not know the genders of the teens who died.

Lee said two of the teens attended the local school that houses seventh through 12th grades, and that one was home- schooled. He declined to release names.

Autopsies were planned for Monday, but Lee said there was no sign of foul play.

“It was an extension cord,” the chief said. “They had it plugged into an appliance, and it wasn’t heavy enough to pack the load of the appliance, and the cord shorted out.”

The house, a rental, did not have smoke alarms, Lee said. Three of the victims were found in bed, he added.

Neighbors reported the family’s using the electric grill about 10 p.m. Friday, he said, and that they appeared to have gone to bed by the time the fire started. He was not sure if the electric grill was the type that featured an off switch or heated just by being plugged in.

“I would unplug it regardless,” Lee said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.