ShareThis Page
Favre says he wants to play, but only if he can win |

Favre says he wants to play, but only if he can win

The Associated Press

The Green Bay Packers aren’t pressuring Brett Favre to make a retirement decision by Saturday’s due date for a $3 million roster bonus. And even if they were, the quarterback doesn’t think he owes the team a decision this weekend anyway.

In his most recent comments about his murky football future, Favre made one thing clear: If he does return, he told a newspaper in his native Mississippi there is “no doubt” it will be his last season.

Saturday’s bonus due date recently has been interpreted as a deadline from the team’s management for Favre to make a decision. But Packers general manager Ted Thompson said the date wasn’t a firm deadline, and reported Friday night that the team had pushed it back to an undisclosed date — the third time this offseason Favre’s bonus date has been delayed.

“If I don’t tell them by Saturday, what will they do, cut me?” Favre told the Sun Herald in Gulfport, Miss.

Favre’s retirement saga has turned into pro football’s version of Groundhog Day, as fans and the media try to predict the future based upon brief public glimpses of the iconic QB during the winter.

Thompson said the bonus date should not be considered a deadline.

“No, it never has been,” Thompson told The Associated Press on Friday. “It’s just another date in the spring.”

Thompson, who has remained in contact with Favre during the offseason, said he hasn’t heard anything that would indicate a decision is imminent.

“We’ve talked to Brett and (wife) Deanna, and I’ve said all along that they’ll decide when they decide,” Thompson said.

Favre said he wants to play again but will return only if the Packers can assemble a winning team.

“Last season, expectations were high and it was a bad situation,” Favre said of the team’s 4-12 season, his only losing one in Green Bay. “If we can’t compete at a high level, I can walk away and my legacy will speak for itself.”

Thompson said Favre’s unclear future isn’t having a negative effect on the team’s preparations for next season. But the sooner Favre decides, the better.

“It’s OK now,” Thompson said. “I think everybody would like to know. I think Brett would like to know.”

The Packers did not pursue experienced quarterbacks such as Aaron Brooks and Brian Griese in free agency, but Thompson said that was not an indication that the Packers are assuming Favre will return.

Aaron Rodgers, the team’s first-round draft pick last season, is presumed to be in line to take over the starting role if Favre retires. But Thompson said the team would look to add a more experienced quarterback, possibly through a trade, if Favre does retire.

“Obviously, with Brett not in the equation, we might have to add another type of player,” Thompson said.

But Thompson hopes it doesn’t come to that.

Favre, who was in Gulfport, Miss., to award grants to help youth football groups rebuild after Hurricane Katrina, said he has been talking to the team for the past month and there are things that both parties have to sort out.

“If they don’t come together, I guess I won’t play,” Favre said. “I don’t know if my decision will be made by Saturday.”

Favre said some days he wants to play and other days he wants to retire. Knowing he can still compete at a high level is making the decision tough, he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.