Fayette coroner’s jury recommends heroin death be ruled homicide, not accidental |

Fayette coroner’s jury recommends heroin death be ruled homicide, not accidental

A Fayette County coroner’s jury recommended Thursday that the manner of death for a man who was allegedly given a fatal overdose of heroin be changed from accidental to homicide.

The recommendation followed a coroner’s inquest into the September 2013 death of Brian Johnson, 41, at his Belle Vernon residence.

Johnson’s death initially was deemed an accidental overdose.

The jury recommended that in the future, deaths of a similar nature undergo additional investigation by the coroner’s office.

Dr. Phillip Reilly said the recommendation means his office likely will conduct inquests into overdose deaths “where the facts were cloudy and difficult to sort, or where testimony under oath would be helpful.”

In October, Southwest Regional Police charged Johnson’s roommate, Terrence Lee Kelly, 42, with drug delivery resulting in death, aggravated assault, heroin possession with intent to deliver, involuntary manslaughter, reckless endangerment, tampering with evidence and obstruction of justice.

They said Kelly injected an overdose of heroin into Johnson’s arm at their home, threw the syringe into the Monongahela River and then went to a local bar.

Kelly’s case will be District Attorney Jack Heneks’ first attempt at prosecuting the charge of drug delivery resulting in death.

The law was amended in 2011 by Gov. Tom Corbett to clarify that drug delivery resulting in death can be prosecuted as third-degree homicide when a person intentionally administers, delivers or prescribes drugs to a person who dies from an overdose.

Reilly said the amendment and the jury’s recommendation marks “not a new era, but a new responsibility” for his office and police investigators.

Jurors heard from Southwest Regional Lt. Steven Schwartz, who testified Kelly told him he purchased the heroin for both men. When Johnson, who had not previously used heroin, could not inject the drug on his own, Kelly helped him, Schwartz testified.

“He took the syringe, found a vein and plunged the syringe for Mr. Johnson,” Schwartz testified.

Kelly’s attorney, Michael Petro of Pittsburgh, asked jurors not to change the manner of death to homicide, because such a finding should be left to medical experts. He argued a toxicology report found Johnson had ingested drugs other than heroin, but Reilly said only the heroin level was lethal.

“But for the administration of heroin, Mr. Johnson would still be alive,” Assistant District Attorney Anthony Iannamorelli argued.

Kelly awaits a preliminary hearing. He is in the Fayette County Prison in lieu of $75,000 bond.

Liz Zemba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.