ShareThis Page
Fayette County woman settles lawsuit against state police |

Fayette County woman settles lawsuit against state police

| Thursday, June 28, 2012 6:54 p.m

A Fayette County woman has apparently settled her federal lawsuit claiming that five state troopers from the barracks near Uniontown pepper-sprayed and urinated on her while she was shackled.

Derena Marie Madison, 41, of Smithfield claimed the incident occurred on Feb. 3, 2011, when state police arrested her for the summary offenses of public drunkenness and disorderly conduct. The officers denied urinating on Madison and contend that they pepper-sprayed her because she kept screaming and hurling racial epithets. After she calmed down, they used warm water to wash the spray out of her eyes, the officers say in court documents.

Both sides today filed a joint motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The motion doesn’t provide any details of the settlement. Neither Madison’s lawyer nore state police could be reached for comment.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.