Fayette man accused of having sex with teen |

Fayette man accused of having sex with teen

A Fayette County man charged with a fatal arson in Fairchance was back in court this week, this time accused of having sex with a teenager.

Richard A. Saluga, 29, of 520 Independence St., Uniontown, was charged with statutory sexual assault and corruption of minors for allegedly having sex twice with a 14-year-old girl.

According to state police at Uniontown, Saluga admitted during questioning that the acts occurred between July 1 and Aug. 31.

He faces a preliminary hearing Oct. 28 before Fairchance District Justice Randy Abraham.

Saluga remains in the Fayette County Prison without bond in connection with the Sept. 14 fire death of W. Ernest Mason, 76.

Police state in court papers that Saluga set fire to an apartment building in Fairchance in an attempt to kill his estranged wife, Jane Saluga.

While 11 people escaped, including Jane Saluga and her four children, Mason died of acute smoke inhalation and carbon monoxide poisoning.

Saluga faces charges of homicide, arson and reckless endangerment.

According to police, Saluga discussed setting the 5 a.m. fire with a juvenile both before and after it occurred.

Saluga was accused of violating a seven-year term of probation after pleading guilty to tearing the esophagus and bruising the genitals of a 2-month-old boy in 1993.

Court papers filed in the case state that Saluga was suspected of sexually assaulting the child, but blood tests on the evidence were inconclusive.

He told police he may have inadvertently left a pen in the boy’s crib, or could have injured the child while letting him suck on his finger. He offered no explanation for the injury to the child’s genitals.

Saluga pleaded guilty to simple assault and endangering the welfare of children, and finished serving his term of probation in 2001. Judge John F. Wagner Jr. refused to jail Saluga after he pleaded guilty to furnishing liquor to minors in 1996.

The judge did, however, order him to seek treatment for an admitted alcohol problem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.