ShareThis Page
Fayette man on run after double shooting |

Fayette man on run after double shooting

Liz Zemba
| Monday, May 13, 2002 12:00 a.m

A Fayette County man is wanted for allegedly shooting another man to death early Sunday morning.

Thomas Edward Miller II, 31, of Masontown is charged with criminal homicide in the death of 28-year-old Charles David Springer of Ronco.

State police at Uniontown also allege Miller shot and critically wounded Springer’s stepfather, 45-year-old Andrew John King of Brownsville. Police said Springer and King were shot at 2:35 a.m. at the intersection of Ronco and Short Cut roads in Ronco, German Township.

King, who suffered a gunshot wound to the left side of his chest, was hospitalized in critical but stable condition, according to police.

Miller allegedly shot the two men with a 12-gauge shotgun after they arrived at the intersection, which is located adjacent to Miller’s residence. A warrant was issued for Miller’s arrest. He is described as 5 feet 9 inches tall and weighing 200 pounds. He has brown hair, brown eyes and numerous body tattoos.

Miller also is charged with attempted homicide, aggravated assault and recklessly endangering another person.

Anyone with information on Miller’s whereabouts is asked to call state police at Uniontown at 724-439-7111. Police provided no additional information, and the investigating officer was unavailable for comment.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.