ShareThis Page
Fayette man says probation officers unlawfully detained him |

Fayette man says probation officers unlawfully detained him

| Wednesday, March 24, 2004 12:00 a.m

UNIONTOWN — A man whose run for Fayette County commissioner last fall was cut short by a jail sentence has called upon that board to investigate the county probation officers who he claims unlawfully detained him.

“I’m not going to let this issue die,” said Michael Cavanagh. “No citizen in this country should have something like this done to them.”

Cavanagh claims the officers detained him with unnecessary force and were out of their jurisdiction before taking him to the Fayette County Prison to begin serving a two-to-24-month sentence for felony insurance fraud. The incident happened last August in Morgantown, W.Va., he said, adding he was not under the probation department’s supervision at the time.

Cavanagh was convicted in 2001, but he was not taken to jail until after his appeal to the state Supreme Court was rejected.

He had filed petitions to run for county commissioner as an independent weeks before his sentence. After his release, he dropped out of the race.

On Tuesday, Cavanagh addressed the board of commissioners for about five minutes, at one point calling the probation officers “rogues.”

“This is a very important issue,” he said. “These are civil rights violations.”

The case has been forwarded to the state Attorney General’s Office, but Cavanagh called upon the commissioners to investigate the matter internally as well.

“Do I have assurance that you’re going to look into it?” he asked.

“No,” said Commissioner Angela Zimmerlink. She said the probation officers are overseen by the court, not her board.

“That’s not to say that the county commissioners would ignore it,” Zimmerlink added.

No decision was made.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.