ShareThis Page
Fayette: Officials look at regional dispatching |

Fayette: Officials look at regional dispatching

| Wednesday, March 24, 2004 12:00 a.m

UNIONTOWN — Fayette County’s head of emergency management wants to cross borders.

In a measure scheduled to be up for vote later this week, Roy Shipley, emergency management director, is seeking to develop a plan to expand the radio dispatch system into Somerset and Greene counties. Doing so would strengthen communication among those responding to fires, accidents and disasters, especially along county borders, Shipley said.

“We dispatch on different frequencies,” he said.

Some of the companies located near borders monitor two radios for emergency calls, but that method is ineffective and expensive, Shipley said.

The possible expansion came under discussion Tuesday at a Fayette County commissioners’ meeting. The board is scheduled to vote Thursday on a resolution that would authorize Shipley to plan the tri-county system.

“I think this is a great opportunity,” said Commissioner Vincent Vicites, adding that it could bring in grants. “The funding is much needed for what you do.”

Planning included, expanding the system may cost $15 million, said Commissioner Angela Zimmerlink. Shipley said he will be looking for grants.

If the regional system is successful, Shipley said he would look to connect it with counties located to the north. Going across the state line would prove useful, too, he said. Often, those hurt in accidents are taken to hospitals in Morgantown, W.Va., or Cumberland, Md., he added.

Emergency response officials have recognized the strengths of regionalized dispatching systems for years, Shipley said. The Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks helped highlight the issue, he added.

“We assisted up there (north of Shanksville) when Flight 93 crashed,” he said. “That would have made it easier then.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.