Archive

ShareThis Page
Fayette parishes’ merger will stand under church court decision | TribLIVE.com
News

Fayette parishes’ merger will stand under church court decision

Tribune-Review
| Friday, November 7, 2014 7:42 p.m

The Supreme Court of the Roman Catholic Church rejected an appeal of a decision upholding the merger of six Fayette County parishes, according to the Diocese of Greensburg.

The decision upholds the merger of the six parishes — All Saints, Masontown; Holy Rosary, Republic; Madonna of Czestochowa, Cardale; St. Mary, Our Lady of Perpetual Help, Leckrone; St. Procopius, New Salem; and St. Thomas, Footedale — into one new parish, St. Francis of Assisi.

Greensburg Bishop Lawrence E. Brandt received the decree Thursday from the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, the Supreme Court of the Roman Catholic Church. The appeal was “rejecting the recourse ‘in limine,’” which means “at the threshold” and without a hearing.

The Vatican supported Brandt’s 2013 merger of six parishes in Western Fayette County. That decree from the Vatican’s Congregation for Clergy was dated May 20, 2014. The Congregation’s decision was appealed by some members of the former parishes.

“I am pleased with the decision … which again confirms that the procedures we followed in making the difficult decision to merge the six parishes,” Brandt said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.