ShareThis Page
Fayette row officers to face challenges |

Fayette row officers to face challenges

| Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:00 a.m

First-term Fayette County Controller Mark Roberts will face opposition in the May 20 primary, along with four other county row officers.

Roberts, who gained notice for his frequent face-offs against Fayette County Commissioner Sean Cavanagh and for his projections of large deficits, faces three opponents.

Former welder and one-time USWA union president John Croftcheck, a fellow Democrat, will challenge Roberts in May for the party’s nomination.

The other two, Republicans John Mikita, a former Brownsville Area School District director, and Art Capella, the Connellsville City treasurer, will face off for the right to take on the winner of the Roberts-Croftcheck contest.

Fayette County District Attorney Nancy Vernon faces a former opponent, Uniontown attorney and county Assistant Solicitor John Cupp, for the Democratic nomination. No one filed nomination papers on the GOP side.

Vernon, a first-term district attorney, bested Cupp in 1999 to replace her former boss, Ralph Warman, who had been appointed judge.

First-term Sheriff Gary Brownfield, a former state trooper, will run against Mark Santore, who was chief deputy when his mother, Norma Santore, was sheriff.

Brownfield defeated Norma Santore in 1999.

Prothonotary Lance Winterhalter faces a primary challenge from Debbie Bortz, a one-time employee of the District Attorney’s Office.

Winterhalter is in his third term.

Clerk of Courts Janice Snyder is in her third term as well. She will run against Sean Lally, who works in the construction business.

The county coroner, Dr. Phillip E. Reilly, faces no opposition, nor does Register of Wills Donald Redmond.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.