Fed robbing seniors |

Fed robbing seniors

The federal government is destroying the lifetime savings of senior citizens using the Federal Reserve’s “quantitative easing” (QE) and “Operation Twist.”

These programs disproportionately focus on devaluing the savings accounts of every senior citizen. The unfairness of this strategy relates to the fact that senior citizens hold most of the privately invested wealth is this country. The result is bilking seniors and rewarding thieves who caused the problem.

QE is essentially creating money out of thin air, using it to buy back financial risky assets held by banks and other financial institutions. This relieves these institutions of possible bad debt and gives them additional reserves to make loans to stimulate the economy. That means that as the banks release the money they are “sitting on,” the dollar will be worth about 70 cents.

“Operation Twist” is intended to reduce long-term interest rates by selling the government’s inventory of short-term bonds. These sales would allow the Fed to purchase long-term bonds, which would force prices up and interest rates down. Unfortunately, the government sale of short-term bonds is inadequate to significantly impact this market, so it is printing more “funny money” to finance it.

The third burden on seniors is the Fed reducing short-term interest rates to zero, so that seniors’ savings essentially generate no income.

Warren A. Smith

Penn Township

Butler County

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.