Archive

ShareThis Page
Ferguson angles to avoid fate of riot-torn cities | TribLIVE.com
News

Ferguson angles to avoid fate of riot-torn cities

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, November 27, 2014 9:57 p.m

FERGUSON, Mo. — Commercial districts in Detroit, Newark and Washington were ravaged by civil unrest in the 1960s, leading to decades of economic stagnation. In Ferguson, business owners are seeking to avert a similar fate.

As law enforcement struggles to restore order, merchants assessing damage from arson and looting said they’re growing anxious over how long it will take to rebuild from unrest sparked by a grand jury’s decision not to charge a white police officer who shot an unarmed, black 18-year-old.

A volunteer group, STL Forward, recognizing the danger of inaction, has started an advertising campaign promoting commerce that features a figure personally linked to the killing.

“I do not want my son’s death to be in vain,” Michael Brown Sr., father of the victim, said in a video. “I want it to lead to incredible change. Positive change. Change that makes the St. Louis region better for everyone.”

Among the first steps is repairing the physical damage.

Officials of the Missouri Department of Insurance met with business owners at the Ferguson Public Library to help merchants file claims.

At least a dozen buildings were burned to the ground Monday and scores of windows were broken in the hours after a St. Louis County prosecutor announced that police Officer Darren Wilson wouldn’t be charged in the death of Michael Brown.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.