ShareThis Page
Ferguson protesters march on Pittsburgh streets |

Ferguson protesters march on Pittsburgh streets

More than 150 demonstrators — chanting “Don’t shoot! Hands up!” — marched through the streets of Oakland on Tuesday night, demanding justice for those they call victims of police brutality.

The protest — with a crowd estimated by police as “a couple hundred” — began about 7 p.m. and took to the streets about 90 minutes later at Forbes Avenue and Bigelow Boulevard.

The officers accompanied the marchers, but there were no reports of any confrontations or arrests.

The demonstrators marched around Forbes and Fifth avenues for more than 30 minutes, forcing police to block or divert traffic. One officer told dispatchers the march appeared to be “part of a coordinated effort to shut down roads across the country.”

It was the second demonstration of the day in Pittsburgh.

About 200 people rallied outside the federal building, Downtown, to demand the prosecution of Ferguson police Officer Darren Wilson for the fatal shooting of Mike Brown and the prosecution of the Pittsburgh police officers involved in the shooting that left Leon Ford paralyzed.

“We are mourning. We are angry, and we are sad,” said Julia Johnson, one of the rally organizers. About a dozen people spoke at the rally with some sharing their personal reactions to a Missouri grand jury refusing to indict Wilson and some urging people to do more than just talk.

Rep. Ed Gainey, D-East Liberty, urged people to get organized and register to vote so that they can end racial profiling. “Power is never given, it is only taken,” he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.