Fighting back: Steelers slug out 35-3 win over Raiders |

Fighting back: Steelers slug out 35-3 win over Raiders

The sense of urgency the Steelers practiced with last week did not translate into anything pleasant from an aesthetics or rhythm standpoint Sunday at Heinz Field.

And left guard Chris Kemoeatu explained it in blunt terms after the Steelers didn’t score many style points but notched their most lopsided victory of the season.

“We knew what we had do to win this game, we had to give it everything we’ve got, whether it was eye gouging and spitting on each other,” Kemoeatu said following the Steelers’ 35-3 win against the Oakland Raiders. “A lot of that was going on this game, which is uncalled for but in the heat of battle stuff like that happens.

“We walked out here with a chip on our shoulder. We knew how physical it was going to be, and we weren’t going to take any B.S. from them. If they were going to try to push us around after the whistle, we were going to try to get the last push in. If we were exchanging words, we were going to get the last one in.”

The Steelers got the final one in by scoring 35 unanswered points, snapping the Raiders’ three-game winning streak and running their record to 7-3.

In dismantling the Raiders (5-5), the Steelers allayed fears that 2009, when they lost five consecutive games in the second half of the season, would play out again.

Though their methods suggested otherwise, the Steelers weren’t interested in turning the clock back to the 1970s when waged a bitter rivalry with the Raiders.

They were more keen on turning the page following their emasculation on national TV a week earlier. A 39-26 loss to the Patriots accounted for, as much as anything, the gritty approach that the Steelers took into yesterday’s game.

It showed in the way they harassed the Raiders’ quarterbacks — the Steelers sacked Jason Campbell and Seton-La Salle graduate Bruce Gradkowski six times. It also showed in Kemoeatu slugging Richard Seymour after the Raiders defensive end punched quarterback Ben Roethlisberger following the second of his three touchdown passes.

The Steelers’ mentality also was apparent in the drive that bridged the first and second quarters and was as impressive as any they have put together this season.

With the Steelers trailing 3-0, Roethlisberger marched the Steelers 85 yards in 14 plays and consumed a little more than eight minutes of the clock.

Rashard Mendenhall gained 34 of his 59 rushing yards on the drive. Roethlisberger completed 5 of 6 passes for 61 yards, including a 27-yarder to Mike Wallace that gave the Steelers their initial first down.

The Steelers also converted twice on third down, and they never trailed after Mendenhall crashed into the end zone for a 5-yard scoring run.

“Any time you can take the ball like that and drive it all the way down the field and score, that really messes up the defense,” Steelers center Maurkice Pouncey said.

What was most significant about the drive in the eyes of the Steelers is where it ended.

“Forget that field goal crap,” right tackle Flozell Adams said.

Apparently, his teammates felt the same way.

The Steelers scored five touchdowns and did not have to call on new kicker Shaun Suisham other than for extra-point attempts.

They would have scored two more touchdowns had penalties not negated a 67-yard punt return by Antonio Brown and a pick six by cornerback Ike Taylor.

“The game got away from us, both teams,” Steelers coach Mike Tomlin said. “It was unfortunate, but I’m not going to let that dominate our thought. We made plays.”

Photo Galleries

Steelers vs. Raiders 11/21/10

Steelers vs. Raiders  11/21/10

The Steelers defeat the Oakland Raiders, 35-3, Sunday November 21, 2010 at Heinz Field.

Additional Information:

Around the Steelers

• Mike Wallace continues to look like an emerging star. The speedy wideout went over 100 yards receiving Sunday for the third consecutive game and helped the Steelers beat the Raiders, 35-3. Wallace’s 52-yard touchdown on the first play of the fourth quarter effectively ended any chances of an Oakland rally. It also came off what Wallace called a ‘rub’ route in which he caught a short Ben Roethlisberger pass and turned it into the longest touchdown of the game. ‘I’m excited to see it on film,’ said Roethlisberger, who didn’t have a good angle when Wallace simply raced past several Raiders defenders en route to his eighth touchdown of the season. ‘I thought he just was going to get the first down. (Reserve quarterback) Charlie (Batch) said he put his foot in the ground and he was gone. It’d fun to play with him.’ Wallace has caught a touchdown pass in three consecutive games. He is the first Steelers player to accomplish that feat since Hines Ward did it in 2005.

• Starting defensive Brett Keisel missed his fourth game because of a hamstring injury. Keisel, who had been listed as questionable for the Raiders game, figures to have a good chance of playing in Buffalo next Sunday.

• Defensive end Aaron Smith (triceps) and reserve safety Will Allen (concussion) didn’t dress yesterday because of injuries. Joining them on the inactive list were offensive tackles Tony Hills and Chris Scott, cornerback Crezdon Butler, running back Jonathan Dwyer and Charlie Batch (third quarterback).

• The players were given today off after by coach Mike Tomlin after their victory over the Raiders constituted the largest one by either team in the series. The players are also off Tuesday and will have an abbreviated day Thursday because of Thanksgiving.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.