Final best of the best in WPIAL football history |

Final best of the best in WPIAL football history

To help celebrate the 100th anniversary of the WPIAL, the Tribune-Review asked its readers to vote for the top 10 players in league history at nine positions. Subsequently, the nine winners were pitted against each other during voting that took place over the past two weeks and North Hills’ Eric Kasperowicz, a dual-threat choice at quarterback and defensive back, was the popular choice among Tribune-Review readers. He beat out Pro Football Hall of Famers Dan Marino, Tony Dorsett and Mike Ditka, among other players who went from Western Pennsylvania to stardom in college and the pros.

All-purpose Eric Kasperowicz, North Hills AP Player of the Year for undefeated 1993 PIAA champ

QB Dan Marino, Central Catholic NFL’s all-time passing leader was first-team all-state in 1978

RB Tony Dorsett, Hopewell First-team all-state in ’72, College and Pro Football Hall of Famer

LB LaVar Arrington, North Hills Parade National Player of the Year in 1996

OL Bill Fralic, Penn Hills Played in four Pro Bowls during eight-year NFL career

TE Mike Ditka, Aliquippa Consensus All-American at Pitt, Pro Football Hall of Famer

DB Tom Flynn, Penn Hills All-state safety in 1979 led three-time WPIAL champs

DL Sean Gilbert, Aliquippa Named 1988 USA Today Defensive Player of the Year

WR Ernie Pitts, Aliquippa Named AP first-team all-state in 1952

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.