ShareThis Page
Finley student suspended for gun threat |

Finley student suspended for gun threat

| Thursday, March 15, 2001 12:00 a.m

An eighth-grade student at Finley Middle School was suspended Wednesday after allegedly threatening to bring a gun to school.

The boy, whose name was noy, whose name was not released, will remain on suspension until after a hearing is held on the matter next week, Ringgold School District Superintendent Larry Golembiewski said.

‘It was an idle threat made by a student, who was very remorseful in the statement he made, but I don’t take anything like this lightly,’ said Golembiewski. ‘We have complied by the book with our crisis management plan.’

Golembiewski said the incident was reported to the Union Township Police, although Golembiewski said district officffic officials have found ‘nothing concrete’ to suggest the student planned to carry out the threat.

The district is continuing to thoroughly investigate the matter, Golembiewski said.

‘We’ll prosecute to the fullest extent that we legally can,’ said Golembiewski.

Union Township Police Chief Paul Bleichner was out on a call this morning and could not be reached for comment.

Golembiewski said the threat was made in the school cafeteria in an overt manner and not directed toward any one student. He said students who overheard the comment reported it to officials in the school office.

‘I’m very proud of the students who reported it to the office,’ said Golembiewski.

Golembiewski said the district’s crisis management plan was approved about 18 months ago. Teachers were recently instructed on the plan during an in-service day, he said.

‘We want to ensure parents and students that the safest place for the children is in school,’ said Golem-biewski.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.