ShareThis Page
Fire officials cite owners of burned Garfield apartment building |

Fire officials cite owners of burned Garfield apartment building

| Tuesday, March 26, 2013 2:15 p.m
James Knox | Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Firefighters battled a multi-alarm fire in the 300 block of North Negley Avenue Monday March 25, 2013 in Garfield.
James Knox | Tribune-Review
Firefighters battled a multi-alarm fire in the 300 block of North Negley Avenue Monday March 25, 2013 in Garfield.

Pittsburgh fire officials cited the owners of an apartment building that caught fire in Garfield for not having doors on stairwells that residents might have used to escape.

J.J. Land Co., which owns the building, was fined $3,000 — $1,000 for not having the doors and $1,000 each for two other violations that made it difficult for residents to get out, fire officials said Tuesday.

Jeff Weisband, one of the building’s owners, said there were no doors on the stairwells when he bought the building. Allegheny County property records show J.J. Land bought the building in February 2007.

Pittsburgh firefighters responding shortly after 7 a.m. Monday used ladders to rescue 24 people as flames and smoke from a chemical fire filled the stairwells of the three-story building in the 300 block of North Negley Avenue.

A number of residents said the only way to safety was out their apartment windows and that, until firefighters arrived, they feared they might have to jump.

They said climbing down the ladders was treacherous because of falling snow.

Investigators determined the fire started when chemicals that maintenance workers left in a hallway ignited. The flames quickly spread into the stairwells, trapping many residents in their apartments.

Four people were hospitalized for smoke inhalation, and paramedics treated 10 at the scene.

Fire officials cited the building’s owners for blocking hallways with construction material and debris, and failing to have battery-powered lighting in the halls that come on when power goes out.

Weisband said the building is equipped with emergency lights. “I thought they were working,” he said, but could not recall the last time they were tested.

Regarding the construction material and debris, Weisband said he was “not sure about that yet.”

The city does not regularly inspect buildings for fire- and safety-code violations, said John Jennings, who heads the city’s Bureau of Building Inspection.

Buildings are inspected when occupancy permits are issued or there are changes in occupancy; when work is completed on projects that require a building permit; and when complaints are filed, Jennings said.

Tony LaRussa is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7987 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.