Archive

ShareThis Page
Fire strikes Mitchell Plant | TribLIVE.com
News

Fire strikes Mitchell Plant

Jeff Pikulsky
| Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:00 a.m

A back-up generator malfunctioned and caused a major fire last night at Allegheny Energy’s Mitchell Plant in Elrama.

Allegheny Energy spokeswoman Janice Lantz said the power station was evacuated approximately 10 p.m. and shut down shortly after a mechanical mishap.

“We had a major generator failure on the unit,” Lantz said. “(It) ignited the lubricating oil on the machinery. There was a major fire … there were pieces of things that went flying.

“We had an electrical fault or a breakdown and that’s what people called the explosion. We’re not sure what happened.”

Lantz said the station would be temporarily closed.

“They will not be back on, at least today,” she said. “There’s a lot of clean up to be done.”

The mishap will not leave customers without power.

“We’ll make up the generation from somewhere else,” she said.

Lantz said nine workers near the generator at the time of the accident were not harmed.

Nine fire departments responded, Lantz added.

“They had the fire under control in a very short period of time,” she said. “They had hot spots continue to flare up until 1:15 (a.m.).”

The generator was activated to supply extra energy at a peak time.

During extremely hot or cold weather, additional generators are used because energy use increases, Lantz said.

Lantz said the faulty oil-fueled unit was first used in 1948.

“As of 1994, we brought it back into our generating fleet,” she said.

The severely damaged 72-mega watt unit generates enough power to supply 7,200 buildings.

The power station is capable of generating more than 400 megawatts, Lantz said.

She could not recall the last accident at the plant.

“That facility, to my knowledge, has had a pretty good safety record,” Lantz said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.