ShareThis Page
First day of G-20 Summit brings eerie calm Downtown |

First day of G-20 Summit brings eerie calm Downtown

| Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:00 a.m

Just about the only sound that could be heard Downtown Thursday morning was the clippity-clop of horses used by officers to patrol the streets.

“I like how they click their feet,” said Jaivaunn Harrison, 6, of Manchester, who was walking on the center of Sixth Avenue with her aunt, Nora Johnson.

Day 1 of the Group of 20 Summit brought an eerie, movie-like feeling to Downtown streets, with massive barricades blocking virtually every intersection. Police guarded street corners and officers in riot gear walked along the Allegheny River near the David L. Lawrence Convention Center.

A few protesters distributed pamphlets. Drivers stood by black vehicles as they awaited delegates in front of most hotels.

Some of the few workers and visitors who ventured into town walked in the middle of the street, since traffic was shut out from usually busy areas such as Grant Street.

“It feels like it’s Sunday morning,” said Millicent Smith, a legal secretary who was volunteering for the G-20 Partnership’s Welcome Center.

Some visitors snapped pictures of emergency workers standing on corners. Alma Yarbrough carried a $7 disposable camera she bought at CVS to show her family the historic event.

“I think it’s beautiful that the world is here,” said Yarbrough, 54, a nurse who lives in Stanton Heights.

National and international journalists streamed into the convention center and set shop at a massive media center, where Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and County Executive Dan Onorato made morning appearances.

Between interviews with Russian and Chinese television stations, Ravenstahl reminded local residents that Pittsburgh remains open for business.

“Downtown is open, despite the fact that a lot of folks decided to stay home today,” Ravenstahl said.

Saying his next stop would be the Emergency Operations Center, the mayor noted that by early afternoon there had been no significant problems with protesters. People are free to speak their minds, he said, adding that police officers would “draw the line” at anyone breaking the law.

“If you had the intention of coming to Pittsburgh to protest or speak your mind … you have the opportunity to do that,” Ravenstahl told a Russian camera crew.

Onorato does not believe the blocked-off streets and other restrictions will affect the image Pittsburgh is trying to present to those attending the G-20 summit.

“For the little bit of time they’re actually in town, they’re going to see some of the assets that make us special,” Onorato said.

That includes both the convention and the Phipps Conservatory & Botanical Gardens where President Barack Obama will host a working dinner tonight.

“They’re going to see the venues that they wanted to see,” Onorato said. The county executive and his wife are scheduled to attend that dinner.

As for the $3.5 million price tag Allegheny County is paying for security, Onorato cited “the multiplier effect of all the advertising we get from the world.” He also reiterated his belief that the county will be fully reimbursed for costs it will spend during the summit.

Contributors: Luis Fábregas, Andrew Conte and Patrick Cloonan

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.