ShareThis Page
First lady, socialism linked on same menu |

First lady, socialism linked on same menu

| Thursday, February 10, 2011 12:00 a.m

The Obama administration has taken on some serious issues — Afghanistan and Iraq, health care reform and WikiLeaks. But there’s one that’s taken on unexpected heft.

It’s actually Michelle Obama’s baby, a healthy-lifestyle initiative called Let’s Move. The program targets lifestyle changes to reduce the obesity epidemic in our country. The administration has changed federal guidelines for school meals, meaning that all schools will have to adhere to new menu requirements soon.

Plum Borough School District Food Supervisor Maryann Lazzaro said last month that the changes were needed, that at the current rate, today’s children might not outlive their parents because of obesity. National statistics back that up. About 27 percent of Pennsylvanians are obese, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nationally, obesity rates have doubled since 1980. So it’s a problem that probably should be addressed sooner than later.

Sounds harmless enough, right?

Former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin slammed the initiative, saying that the government is trying to make nutritional decisions for children that should be made by parents. (Just because an idea comes along from the opposite side of the aisle, does it mean you have to slam it• Sheesh.)

It’s understood that Palin might use this as a political point, but more surprising is that others agree. This week, when Michelle Obama spoke to restaurant executives to encourage them to offer healthier alternatives and portions for menu items, even more feathers were ruffled.

A friend of mine posted the story about her speech on his Facebook page (yes, now the undisputed pulse of America) and the comments that followed were interesting. Most accused the administration of socialism and of trying to tell them what they can and cannot eat. Those were the tame ones.

Fascinating. At what point did it become a problem for the government to limit our exposure to bad things• There’s an extraordinary tax on cigarettes, meant in part to make it more difficult to buy them. Also, drugs such as marijuana, crack and cocaine are illegal. For the most part, we accept that those are bad things that can kill us, and so there’s no problem.

News flash: Too much butter and salt can kill you, too. Inactivity leads to heart disease, diabetes and other maladies that can be fatal.

Also, let’s remember that there’s always access to food that’s terrible for you if you need a taste — and sometimes, you do. There are always fast-food chains and supermarkets. I question how many people would taste their restaurant food and say, “Something’s missing here. There aren’t enough trans fatty acids in here! What gives?”

The initiative is offering better access to healthy food, not the elimination of the high calories and fat that we crave. In other words, no one is taking the Primanti’s sandwich out of anyone’s hands, so we can relax.

If there’s really any doubt about the obesity epidemic in our schools and among adults, look around. When was the last time you saw a child who was too big for his britches?

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.