ShareThis Page
Fisher sends letter telling Catholics he shares their values |

Fisher sends letter telling Catholics he shares their values

| Thursday, October 3, 2002 12:00 a.m

HARRISBURG — Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Fisher has written to tens of thousands of Roman Catholics in the state, soliciting their support for his campaign and stressing that he shares the church’s viewpoints on abortion, school vouchers and homosexual “partnerships.”

The two-page letter, paid for by the Republican State Committee, was mailed to more than 75,000 Catholics who are active in the church, a Fisher campaign spokesman confirmed Wednesday.

Fisher, a Catholic, noted that his Democratic opponent, former Philadelphia Mayor Edward G. Rendell, supports abortion rights, opposes vouchers that would help parents defray the cost of sending children to parochial and private schools, and supports the recognition of same-sex unions.

“I respectfully submit that my record — as a state legislator and as attorney general — and my platform represent the best chance of upholding the values that you and I hold so dear,” Fisher wrote in the Sept. 20 letter.

A poll released yesterday indicates Catholics support Rendell over Fisher nearly 2-1. The poll by Millersville University’s Center for Opinion Research showed Rendell leading among registered voters, with 45 percent to Fisher’s 30 percent. Among Catholics, Rendell, who is Jewish, claimed 53 percent, and Fisher 27 percent.

Fisher reiterated that he would sign legislation outlawing abortions, with limited exceptions, if the U.S. Supreme Court should reverse its 29-year-old stand legalizing the procedure. He also said the next governor “will be faced with many opportunities to protect human life.”

“From limiting abortions to ensuring that parents have a proper role in counseling their pregnant teenagers, from embryonic stem-cell research to human cloning, the next governor will have the power to protect life or to allow it to be destroyed,” he said.

Fisher’s letter does not mention that his hand-picked running mate, Jane Earll — a state senator from Erie who also is a Catholic — supports abortion rights. Fisher’s campaign manager, Kent Gates, said the omission was not an attempt to hide Fisher’s and Earll’s “difference of opinion on the life issue.”

Rendell’s running mate, former state Treasurer Catherine Baker Knoll, opposes abortion rights, placing the Democratic candidates at odds on the issue as well.

“Ed Rendell’s the top of the ticket. The agenda is his,” said his campaign spokesman, Dan Fee, contrasting Rendell’s leadership style to the “partnership” that Fisher and Earll tout in their campaign.

Fisher said the Supreme Court recently handed voucher advocates “an important victory” in a Cleveland case. He promised, if elected, to double the state tax credit available to businesses that offer scholarships to private and parochial schools, and to work to make vouchers “a reality for deserving students in Pennsylvania.”

Fisher said laws like the Philadelphia ordinances recognizing same-sex partnerships for the purpose of obtaining insurance and other benefits available to married couples are “attempts to redefine the traditional family and to redefine marriage.” The ordinances, which Rendell signed, were struck down in August by the Commonwealth Court on grounds they usurped the state’s power to regulate marriage.

“Marriage has been and must be a union of one man and one woman, for life,” Fisher wrote.

Rendell has said he would support recognizing same-sex partnerships through changes in state law, but has not spelled out a proposal, Fee said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.