Fitzgerald vows transit changes |

Fitzgerald vows transit changes

Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald implored lawmakers from the Pittsburgh region who voted against a $2.3 billion transportation plan to reconsider their votes for the sake of the region’s economy.

Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald said on Monday he’ll help drive the evolution of the financially troubled Port Authority transit agency, insisting it will change one way or another.

“Changes are going to take place within the existing structure or within a new structure. … However that comes about, it needs to come about,” Fitzgerald said during a meeting with Tribune-Review editors and reporters.

Although Port Authority operates independently, Fitzgerald appoints its board members and signs off on $27.7 million in annual county funding that leverages more than $150 million from the state. That gives him considerable clout to influence change at an agency that operates on about $370 million a year. It faces a $64 million deficit next fiscal year.

As the Port Authority prepares to impose the largest service cuts in its 48-year history on Sept. 2, eliminating service to wide swaths of the county, Fitzgerald said he would like it to maintain “at least skeletal service” to all corners of the county, even if the service is infrequent and along only major arteries.

“That would be a core principle for me,” Fitzgerald said.

Four months into his job, Fitzgerald is overseeing contract talks between Port Authority management and the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 85, which represents 2,300 drivers, mechanics and other workers and 3,300 retirees. Their contract expires June 30.

Fitzgerald initiated negotiations in January, about three months earlier than usual, stressing the need to reach a concession-laden deal and to reduce management costs further.

“My whole administration is really involved almost on a daily basis. At least three to four days a week, we’re meeting with Port Authority and the union,” Fitzgerald said.

He said Gov. Tom Corbett and state legislators told him they “need to see savings from Port Authority, both in the union contract and on the management side, before they are willing to put more money from the state toward helping transit.”

Scorching insults and fiery rebukes often punctuated the relationship between the union local and former County Executive Dan Onorato, a Democrat like Fitzgerald.

Union President Pat McMahon called Onorato a “union buster” and a hypocrite, and Onorato referred to union concession offers as nothing more than “a Band-aid.”

McMahon’s criticism of Onorato hasn’t stopped. Moments before the authority authorized a record 35 percent service cut on April 27, McMahon said Onorato and the board “turned their backs” on what he said were more than $19 million in union concessions last year.

McMahon hasn’t targeted Fitzgerald and instead has implored the Republican governor to ante up state money.

“It’s calmer because (Fitzgerald is) telling the transit union that he’s on their side,” said Jim Roddey, former county executive and chairman of the county’s GOP committee. “As soon as the deadline comes and they start the cutting, the rhetoric will ramp back up.”

The union donated $7,500 to Fitzgerald’s 2011 campaign and didn’t donate to his Republican opponent, Mt. Lebanon businessman D. Raja, records show.

Gerald Shuster, a University of Pittsburgh political communication professor, said Fitzgerald wisely is trying “quiet diplomacy” with the union.

“His approach is quieter and much more behind-the-scenes to try to work something out,” Shuster said. “He has avoided drawing a line in the sand, which is what has always happened before.”

Labor concessions won’t solve all of Port Authority’s problems.

Operationally, Fitzgerald said the agency should cross-train drivers to operate buses and light-rail T cars to prevent driver shortages and delays, and needs to address a fare-collector shortage that occasionally leaves T booths unmanned.

He said the agency should seek sources of revenue, including increased advertising sales and corporate contributions, that could help extend the T’s free-fare zone to Station Square.

Port Authority spokesman Jim Ritchie said the agency plans to recall 53 laid-off drivers and two furloughed toll collectors and to increase cross-training. The agency recently OK’d plans to accept a wider range of ads, including those pitching alcohol.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.