ShareThis Page
Flicker of bipartisanship emerges in efforts to combat opiate abuse |

Flicker of bipartisanship emerges in efforts to combat opiate abuse

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — In a testy election year likely to see scant collaboration between Republicans and Democrats, there’s a glint of hope in Congress for a bipartisan bill aimed at fighting heroin and opioid addiction — a deadly, growing problem that afflicts states both red and blue.

Senate and House bills establishing grants to combat abuse, improve treatment and bolster law enforcement programs are winning support from members of both parties. President Obama used this month’s State of the Union address to call such legislation one area where lawmakers “might surprise the cynics” and get something done this year.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., whose state has one of the nation’s highest death rates from drug overdoses, said GOP senators discussed the issue at their closed-door lunch Wednesday and added that he hopes the Senate will approve legislation by the end of this year.

“We’re trying to craft something that we think makes the difference,” McConnell said.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called the problem “a scourge” and said the target to pass legislation should not be year’s end but “as soon as possible.”

Potential GOP changes include provisions tightening border controls to combat heroin shipments from Mexico and cracking down on excessive prescribing of painkillers, but No. 2 Senate Republican leader John Cornyn of Texas said lawmakers are “in the early stages of thinking about that.”

Both parties’ interest in the effort doesn’t mean it will have smooth sailing in Congress or isn’t colored by politics. Some Republicans prefer a greater emphasis on law enforcement attempts to stop heroin from entering the United States from Mexico, and there are concerns about the measure’s cost. And on the campaign trail, some Senate Republicans seeking re-election this November are being attacked over the issue by Democrats trying to oust them.

“It’s an effort every single state and every senator should have a strong interest in,” said Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, a leading co-sponsor of the legislation.

Nationally, drug overdose deaths have more than doubled since 2000, with a record 47,000 dying in 2014, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That’s more than the number of Americans who die annually in auto accidents or from gunshots. Six in 10 of those deaths involved opiates, which include heroin and prescription pain relievers such as hydrocodone and oxycodone.

Opioid abuse is “the No. 1 drug threat facing our country,” Louis J. Milione, a top official at the Drug Enforcement Administration, told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday at a hearing on legislation sponsored by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., Portman and — so far — 20 others.

The bill does not have an official price tag and leaves final decisions on how to pay for it until later.

Portman and Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., whose states have major drug abuse problems, each testified in support of the measure at the judiciary panel hearing and have made the issue a top priority.

With both facing competitive re-election contests this fall, the issue lets each senator attract attention to a high-profile local concern.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.