ShareThis Page
Flight 93 stories sought for memorial archives |

Flight 93 stories sought for memorial archives

| Saturday, May 14, 2005 12:00 a.m

The National Park Service is seeking stories for an oral history of the crash of United Airlines Flight 93 on 9/11 for the archives that will be housed in Somerset County.

Barbara Black, Flight 93 National Memorial curator, recorded the first half-dozen interviews this week. In addition to recollections and reactions from family members, Black said she’s looking for stories from first-responders, residents near the crash site in Stonycreek Township, and anyone else who feels a strong connection to the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.

So far, Black said she has interviewed the first state police trooper who responded to the scene, a Stonycreek Township supervisor and a former superintendent for PBS Coals Inc., which owned the idled mine land where the plane crashed.

“All we have is what the media has written,” Black said. “Doing oral histories is what helps us understand the entire story.”

Black can be reached at 814-443-4557. Her e-mail is . The mailing address for submitting a story is Barbara Black, Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 W. Main St., Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.