ShareThis Page
Florida high school prostitution ring busted |

Florida high school prostitution ring busted

The Associated Press

VENICE, Fla. — Students at a Southwest Florida high school told administrators that two teens tried to recruit them into a “prostitution ring” and that one 15-year-old boy have been “pimping out girls,” according to an arrest affidavit.

By Tuesday, detectives in Venice, a small community in Sarasota County, had charged three people in connection with the case.

The boy and a 17-year-old girl were charged with human trafficking, and a 21-year-old man was charged with sexual battery on a victim older than 12. Police said he paid a 15-year-old girl from Riverview High School $40 and a bottle of alcohol for sex.

Venice Police say the investigation continues, and there may be more victims.

The idea to form a prostitution ring gained traction through a series of online messages between the two around Aug. 13, according to investigators who searched the pair’s Facebook accounts.

The messages included a business plan to “pimp hoes” with rates such as $50 to $70 for oral sex and $100 for sex with a virgin. The cut for prostitutes was 40 percent.

In the messages they discussed prices, ages of prospective prostitutes and details of the operation, according to the police report.

Alexa Nicole De Armas, the 17-year-old who was charged, wrote, “lol we need to start a business.”

De Armas was able to convince “Megan” to have sex with John Mosher, 21, for $40 and a bottle of alcohol, police said. After seeing how easy it was, the teen girl worked to recruit more girls to have sex with “clients,” according to investigators.

The 15-year-old boy and De Armas used the money to buy drugs and booze, according to the affidavit.

The 15-year-old was in the custody of the Department of Juvenile Justice for unrelated charges.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.