ShareThis Page
Focus on recovery |

Focus on recovery

Letter To The Editor
| Monday, July 13, 2015 9:00 p.m

Ellen Condie’s letter “Try Hribal as an adult” brings forth how the trauma at Franklin Regional affected the community of Murrysville. It was indeed an event catalyzing lingering trauma — as was Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the tornado that plummeted through my hometown on my 15th birthday that left dozens of my neighbors homeless in June 2008, and 9/11 on a national scale. However, do these events really last forever?

I remember New Orleans from my travels in college for its beautiful French architecture and streets lined with jazz, not for the shattered structures brought about by the devastating waves that hit a decade ago. My hometown thrives as if the tornado was a distant legend. And the Pentagon stands again as we commemorate our strength as a national community every September.

I commend the community of Murrysville for its strength and find greater value in this than in ranting condemnation of one fallen child to mental illness. Tragedies unavoidably happen around the world, and the beauty of human strength is recovering and pushing forward (with recovery being allotted to all).

Katherine Bunting

Manhattan, Kan.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.