ShareThis Page
Food fight: Chinese dumplings |

Food fight: Chinese dumplings

The Tribune-Review
| Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:00 a.m

Three restaurants. Two diners. One item. Everyone leaves with a little egg on their face.

Jo Jo Bodnar: Usually bypass Chinese appetizers to better enjoy the main entree. But I gave them another try.

James Knox: I can create entire meals out of Chinese appetizers. And that’s a good thing.

China Palace 5440 Walnut St., Shadyside 412-687-RICE $4.50 for friend pork dumplings

Jo Jo: We tried dumplings in honor of the Chinese New Year on Sunday, but these were just bland and bad. Not even the sauce could help these overfried dumplings. All dough, and tough at that. If it was actually pork, the filling had no flavor.

James: Big fat dumplin’s carny-style. Deep fried like a funnel cake. Huge and too doughy. The meat left no taste, yet it seemed to linger for hours afterward. Can I say gut bomb• Put it on a stick and you’ve got the silent killer of the Big Butler Fair.

Sesame Inn Station Square 412-281-8282 $5.50 for fried dumplings

Jo Jo: Tangy sauce overpowered the dumplings’ taste. Points for the bed-of-lettuce presentation — but what do you do with the lettuce?

James: Good size for one bite. Meat was flavorful but not too exciting. Sauce was a little sweet, which is good. Meticulously pleated and quickly pan-fried.

PF Chang’s China Bistro The Waterfront, West Homestead 412-464-0640 $4.95 for Peking dumplings, pan fried

Jo Jo: Plenty of pork and spices with just enough dough. My favorites. A variety of sauces accompanied these dumplings, but they could stand alone. Didn’t leave me feeling too stuffed.

James: Sauce hit it on the head — spicy sweet, tickled with peppery green onion. Dumpling was delicate and not gooey. It was not a mystery that the meat was pork. The only downer was you get four dumplings instead of the standard six.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.