ShareThis Page
Food fight: Irish beer |

Food fight: Irish beer

Rob Amen And Jessica Severs
| Thursday, March 15, 2007 12:00 a.m

Three brands. Two imbibers. Only one you’ll remember tomorrow.

Meet the drinkers

Rob Amen: I’m getting paid for this• Let me tip my hat to the gent at the Clark Bar & Grill who poured three near-perfect pints.

Jessica Severs: People who drink green, watered-down commerical crap on St. Patrick’s Day should be beaten with a shellalagh.

Smithwick’s, $4

Rob: That’s Smittick’s, for you yinzers. A superb reddish ale with a taste so unique that you feel like you’re sipping a pint in Dublin. A bit hoppier than Harp — almost enough to make you happier drinking it.

Jessica: My second-fave. Lager can’t hold a shamrock to the sharp, hoppy bite and gorgeous ruddy color of this ale. The flavor isn’t as strong as Guinness, but it’s more intense than Harp. And the carbonation gives it the pop of a soda.

Harp, $4

Rob: Ah, music to my ears — and taste buds. This golden lager goes down smooth and packs a flavorful pop, even more than Smithwick’s. A good starting point into the Irish genre for you Iron City and IC Light types.

Jessica: The perfect social beer. The color of a sun-drenched barley field, light and crisp, it goes down easy with a light hop bite on the tongue. It’s my least favorite of the three but still far superior than most popular commercial beers.

Guinness, $5

Rob: Winner, and still the granddaddy of ’em all. Enjoy the aroma before indulging in this rich stout with a coffee-like flavor

and thick head. Eat beforehand, ’cause you certainly won’t be hungry afterward.

Jessica: Skip dessert and order up the black beauty of beers. Smooth yet robust, lightly hopped with a roasted, slightly sweet taste. Drink it from the bottle and you’ll miss the show: the creamy head slowly separating from the rich, decadent body.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.