ShareThis Page
For those who will care, ‘Hannah Montana’ is a charming outing |

For those who will care, ‘Hannah Montana’ is a charming outing

The Associated Press
| Thursday, April 9, 2009 12:00 a.m

There’s no way to analyze this movie as an adult. The big-screen version of the Disney TV series is not made for us — it’s made for tween girls and no one else — and so we must consider how they’re going to respond to it.

Now, this will come as no surprise at all, but they’re gonna love it. If you were a 10-year-old girl, you’d also want to be small-town sweetheart Miley Stewart and-or her secret pop-star alter ego, Hannah Montana. Singer-songwriter-dancer-trendsetter Miley Cyrus makes both characters so likably harmless, so attractively accessible, it’s hard not to be charmed.

Just you try to resist her endless supply of energy and moxie. Even when she gets a little carried away with her celebrity lifestyle in Los Angeles — which prompts a return to Tennessee for some hometown reprogramming — she still has a magnetism about her.

Nevertheless, “Hannah Montana: The Movie” drags us all back to the fictional Crowley Corners to bang us over the head with the message that big cities are bad and small towns are good.

And there’s plenty of down-home singin’ and cuttin’ up to emphasize that point. The predictable (although beautifully photographed) film from director Peter Chelsom finds Miley’s dad, Robby Ray (Cyrus’ real-life father, Billy Ray), taking her home to reconnect with her roots.

There she bonds with Grandma (Margo Martindale) and finds her first boyfriend (Lucas Till), a non-threatening farmhand she’s known since childhood. But a British tabloid reporter (Peter Gunn) has followed her there, trying to dig up some dirt on Hannah.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.