ShareThis Page
Ford City approves new ordinance for landlord-tenant rental property |

Ford City approves new ordinance for landlord-tenant rental property

FORD CITY — Council Monday approved a new landlord tenant ordinance that provides rules for rental properties. It also sets the fees charged landlords.

Landlords in the borough had asked council to lower the fees initially proposed for the ordinance and council did so in accordance with their recommendations.

“I believe we’ve addressed and resolved everything that’s been discussed,” borough solicitor Frank Wolfe said of the final draft of the ordinance.

The ordinance is effective January 1.

The fees in the ordinance will be one annual $50 fee to be a landlord regardless of the number of properties and $15 for each additional rental property. Reinspection fees are $25. The fee for appeals from codes officer decisions is $500.

Council also approved an amendment to the borough’s business privilege tax ordinance to remove landlords from it, effective Jan. 1, to coincide with the new landlord tenant ordinance.

The vote was 4-1 on the amendment to the business privilege tax with council members John Lux, Tom Shaffer, Ray Klukan and Ron Dillard voting yes, Terry Tokarek voting no with Tim Malec being absent due to work.

Tokarek said he voted no because the landlords are still subject to paying the higher fees for this year.

President Judge Kenneth Valasek dismissed a complaint against the borough recently brought by Ford City landlords who were upset with being taxed $150 per rental property. The matter remains unresolved as it was left open for the landlords to file an amended complaint. The new fees don’t take effect until January and landlords are still responsible for the 2009 tax.

Some landlords have paid the tax while others have not, according to borough officials.

In other borough business, council:

• Tabled action regarding repeal of the borough’s per capita tax, for further discussion.

• Tabled action on a new towing ordinance.

• Announced a savings for the borough in the borough employee’s health care insurance coverage.

• Held an executive session to discuss the borough workers’ collective bargaining agreement. Workers represented by the United Steelworkers of America have been without a labor contract since Jan. 31 of this year. Council took no action upon returning to the public meeting other than to say they had agreed to contact the mediator.

• Moved November’s regular public meeting from Nov. 2 to Nov. 9.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.