ShareThis Page
Ford City Council reorganizes and says focus will be on a ‘positive attitude’ |

Ford City Council reorganizes and says focus will be on a ‘positive attitude’

| Tuesday, January 8, 2002 12:00 a.m

FORD CITY – A council member with two years experience serving on council was elected its president in a reorganizational vote at last night’s regular public meeting.

Dan Cousins was elected to the two-year position by a vote of 4-2 following the swearing in of new council members Ron Gribik and Steve Kozuch who replaced Lou Vergari and Jackie Fijal.

Cousins said he expects the new council to have a different attitude than recent councils.

“I see it being positive,” said Cousins. “It should take a totally new direction with new ideas, an openness and create an interest with the community.”

Cousins was nominated by Kozuch. Homer Pendleton nominated Tim Malec. Jerry Miklos, Gribik and Kozuch each cast their vote for Cousins.

Gribik was elected by a 6-0 vote for vice-president of borough council after Malec declined a nomination.

Cousins asked each member of council what issues they thought were most important.

Gribik listed improvements on Ford and other streets as his priority.

“As a group if we tackle issues, we can be more productive,” said Gribik.

Miklos gave as his priorities, establishing a nepotism policy, a public newsletter and a clear picture of the financial condition of the borough.

“At this point the finances are very cloudy,” said Miklos.

Kozuch said cost saving efforts were needed.

Pendleton said council members should give more of their time to the borough.

“Come in here often, not once in a month,” said Pendleton.

Malec agreed with Pendleton.

“Six people should be working toward the betterment of the town,” said Malec.

Malec also wants Ford Street to be the showplace in the revitalization of the borough.

Council agreed on shorter public meetings and seeking out more citizens for committees.

Miklos proposed a set of operating procedures for council to review and approve.

The procedures were in regard to: minutes of meetings being distributed in five days and voted on by the next meeting; notice time given for special meetings called; keeping the public informed in regard to borough business; labor and contract negotiation meetings taking place only with the knowledge of every council member; and the approval of expenses other than emergency; and normal operating only by a vote of the entire council.

“This was put together in an effort to avoid some of the problems we’ve had in the past,” said Miklos.

Council decided to review the procedures prior to voting at the February public meeting.

After the reorganization, council addressed regular borough business.

Council discussed the possible 2002 CDBG project on Ford Street. Municipal proposals need to be submitted to the county by Jan. 18.

It was discussed that citizen income surveys needed to qualify for the grant must be turned no later than by Feb. 1. Mayor Jeff Pyle stressed the importance of citizens completing the surveys.

Council approved 6-0 to file for the grant in the amount of $116,000. Council will decide later if Ford Street will be paved by asphalt or by bricks if the grant is approved.

Council took action to get its third of three wells in working order with a new motor for the pump.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.