Ford City eyes increased fees for landlords |

Ford City eyes increased fees for landlords

A proposed increase in fees landlords pay to have rental properties in Ford City has some council members worried that the financial boost would hurt more than help the borough.

The proposed change in the landlord-tenant ordinance would increase to $50 the fee landlords pay for each apartment in the buildings they own. The current fee is $50 for one apartment and $15 for each additional unit owned by the landlord. That means a landlord who had a four-apartment building would pay $200 instead of $95 a year, Borough Manager Eden Ratliff said.

Such an increase is too much in the eyes of Councilman Josh Abernathy.

“If you have a triplex, that’s $50 times three a year. It’s going to drive people out,” Abernathy said Tuesday.

Abernathy said the higher fee could bring more absentee landlords, who, without a stake in the community, would have little incentive to maintain the properties.

“We’re not attracting local landlords,” he said. “All it would do is drive property values down.”

He and Council President Kathy Bartuccio at a Monday meeting voted against advertising the proposed fee increase — a step needed before the ordinance can be changed by the board. Council at the meeting voted 3-2, with Councilman Scott Gaiser absent, to place the advertisement announcing the proposed change.

Ford City in 2010 adopted the landlord-tenant ordinance that established the fee and required landlords to register each of their rental units. The ordinance was put in place to regulate rental properties, which by 2009 were estimated to have grown in number to 500, or about a third of all homes in the borough.

But Abernathy, who owns rental properties outside the borough, said increasing fees in the regulation would leave landlords unlikely to absorb the added cost.

“In other municipalities, properties get sucked up by landlords because they don’t have these restrictions,” he said. “A house has to break even for it to be a viable option. You can’t pass the increase onto a tenant because they just won’t rent your house.”

Tracey Rowley, rental manager for Altman Real Estate in Kittanning, said she doesn’t think Abernathy’s fears are warranted.

“It’s not a considerable jump,” she said. “I think local landlords would be OK with the increase.”

Rowley thinks increasing the fee may even encourage landlords to become more responsible for their properties.

“They may take a little more care in finding the right tenant … not just putting in a tenant to have a tenant,” she said.

Julie E. Martin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1315 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.