ShareThis Page
Ford City Junior Senior High School students evacuated after bomb threat |

Ford City Junior Senior High School students evacuated after bomb threat

Mitch Fryer
| Tuesday, December 7, 2010 12:00 a.m

FORD CITY — Police are investigating a bomb threat at Ford City Junior Senior High School that caused the evacuation of all students from the building on a cold, blustery morning.

According to a statement released via e-mail by Ford City police, the threat was made at 9:41 a.m. Monday. Police did not say how the threat was received at the school or the content of the threat. They declined to discuss whether there are any leads, adding they would release further information today.

Armstrong School Board President Rose Stitt said someone found a note in the building.

“We took the usual safety precautions,” Stitt said of the district’s protocol. She said the policy is for school officials to send parents a message explaining the incident but she did not know if that was done.

Students were sent to two locations in other parts of the borough.

Police and fire officials secured the area around the school and the school building while the school was searched by bomb-sniffing dogs from the Armstrong County District Attorney’s Office and the Pittsburgh Police Department.

After completion of the search, which uncovered no suspicious devices, students were cleared to return to the school, police said.

Officials in the district administration provided no information to reporters about the incident. No one returned repeated calls seeking information.

Stitt said students were dismissed for the day at the regular time and classes were expected to resume today. Scheduled after-school activities were conducted at the school yesterday.

State police, Ford City Fire Department and fire police assisted.

Ford City police are asking anyone with information to call 724-763-9024.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.