ShareThis Page
Ford Street revamp is on hold |

Ford Street revamp is on hold

Mitch Fryer
| Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:00 a.m

FORD CITY – Even though the borough has been awarded $55,000 in county grant money for street repairs, much needed major work on Ford Street will have to wait until next year.

Councilman Homer Pendleton said that’s because the grant isn’t available until the end of 2002.

For now the borough will be content to make some minor repairs to the areas of broken curbs and asphalt patched brick paving along its main business district thoroughfare.

The repair work will be paid for out of the borough’s liquid fuels funds.

The borough is in the process of deciding if the paving of the street will be done with bricks or asphalt. Last week a representative of a brick paving company did a study of the street and gave council members some options and costs.

Council president Dan Cousins said the street improvements were discussed at a special public meeting following the paving company’s visit.

Options include reusing many of the existing bricks and matching those bricks with new ones to complete the paving project.

Another is a smaller thinner layer of bricks over blacktop paving.

“That’s a money saving idea,” said Cousins of the latter option.

The borough can still pave the street using just asphalt although council has said it likes maintaining the brick look.

All paving options include revamping the streets curbs.

Cousins wants to get the minor repairs, especially to curbs, completed as soon as possible.

“These are safety type issues needing addressed,” said Cousins. “The streets are still going to look bad.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.