Former CAPA teacher in bank robbery case charged with stealing school computers |

Former CAPA teacher in bank robbery case charged with stealing school computers

Two days before a former science teacher was arrested on charges connected to a bank robbery, Pittsburgh police said she admitted to stealing 10 to 15 laptops from a Downtown magnet school.

Police on Sunday charged Philicia Barbieri, 24, of Shadyside with theft by unlawful taking. School administrators confronted her with surveillance video showing her taking a laptop in March from a classroom at Pittsburgh School for the Creative and Performing Arts, according to a complaint filed against her.

Barbieri eventually broke down crying and admitted to administrators on March 31 that she took 15 laptops totaling about $22,500 from CAPA between December and March, the complaint said.

Barbieri admitted to stealing the laptops to sustain a heroin habit, the complaint said.

She is suspended with pay pending a due process hearing, said district spokeswoman Ebony Pugh.

On Friday, she was accused of being an accomplice in a Shadyside bank robbery.

Barbieri and her boyfriend, Alvin Carter III, 28, were arrested in the parking lot of the Barack Obama Academy of International Studies in East Liberty a short time after the holdup at Fifth Third Bank in Penn Circle South.

Barbieri was hired by the district as a full-time substitute in February 2010 and taught chemistry at Peabody High School in East Liberty, according to district records. School officials said she began teaching at CAPA in September.

According to her Facebook page, Barbieri is a 2008 graduate of Chatham University.

She told police “that she and Carter were desperate for the money after their landlord had come to them (Friday) morning looking for the rent,” according to a criminal complaint filed to support the bank robbery charges.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.