Former Consol official pleads guilty to siphoning $440K in gas royalties |

Former Consol official pleads guilty to siphoning $440K in gas royalties

The former land records general manager for Consol Energy Inc. admitted Wednesday to swindling the company out of about $440,000 in gas royalties.

Scott D. Hamilton, 37, of Baden pleaded guilty to two counts of mail fraud. Each count carries a possible sentence of 20 years in prison.

U.S. District Judge David Cercone scheduled Hamilton’s sentencing for March 25. Hamilton remains free on a $25,000 unsecured bond. His attorney couldn’t be reached for comment.

Using his position at the Cecil-based energy company, Hamilton in 2009 used fake names to file deed transfers on an 1,100-acre parcel in Fayette County, W.Va., and a 95-acre parcel in Christian County, Ill., prosecutors said.

Once the deed transfers went through, he had natural gas royalty payments for the two properties sent to a fake company he ran out of a Canonsburg post office box, prosecutors said.

Consol discovered the missing royalty payments and reported the thefts to authorities, a company spokeswoman said in September, when federal prosecutors charged Hamilton.

A Consol representative did not return a phone call Wednesday.

Brian Bowling is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.