Former Ebara executives not bidding for company assets |

Former Ebara executives not bidding for company assets

Today is likely to be an emotional day for Richard Rosey and longtime business partner John Easoz as their effort to build a solar cell manufacturing company in western Pennsylvania over the past decade fades to black.

The two had been working with former Bayer Corp. executive Larry Stern to save the assets of the former Ebara Solar of Belle Vernon. But Rosey said Wednesday they have been unable to raise the money needed to buy the company’s equipment at a state bankruptcy auction being held today. They will only be interested observers of the process.

“I feel like we gave it our best effort,” Rosey said. “Larry did a great job, but in the end, it didn’t happen for us.”

Rosey said Ebara — the Japanese maker of industrial pumps that signed on nine years ago to fund the research and development of flexible thin-film solar cells, work that had been ongoing at Westinghouse Electric Corp. — did not sign off in time on the licensing of its intellectual property.

Without that agreement, he said, potential local investors backed away.

Ebara funded the construction of a $7 million facility in Belle Vernon that opened nearly three years ago, when the company employed as many as 100 people.

But last year, facing difficulty in its primary business, Ebara executives told Rosey the company would terminate its investment.

Rosey immediately laid off his staff and sought new investors. Ebara eventually let the operation fall into state receivership, and an auction is scheduled for today at 9 a.m.

Rosey said the last hope is for someone to bid on the entire range of assets.

“We would be interested in working with anyone who would put in a bulk bid,” he said.

If bids on individual lots of equipment end up being greater than any single bid on the entire asset package, the assets will go to the several bidders.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.