ShareThis Page
Former Oakmont Giant Eagle site remains barren |

Former Oakmont Giant Eagle site remains barren

Karen Zapf
| Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:00 a.m

It has been a little more than a year since the Giant Eagle on Allegheny River Boulevard closed, and Mayor Robert Fescemyer continues to hear from residents who miss the grocery store and wonder what will replace it.

“I get a lot of calls, and people on the street are asking me what’s going on,” Fescemyer said.

The mayor said he doesn’t have any answers.

ECHO Retail, a division of ECHO Development, based in O’Hara and affiliated with Giant Eagle, took over ownership of the site July 1, Fescemyer said.

Councilman Tim Favo, who heads the community development committee, said ECHO plans to develop the site. But ECHO officials have not told local leaders about their plans.

ECHO officials could not be reached for comment.

The parking lot is chained off, and weeds are growing around the shuttered 25,000-square-foot building.

Favo said borough officials are signing a lease with ECHO to make the parking spaces available for borough residents.

Favo said the borough persuaded ECHO to keep the lights on at the 1.25-acre site at the corner of Allegheny River Boulevard and Pennsylvania Avenue.

The councilman said he would have liked to have seen a Giant Eagle Express at the site but believes ECHO officials are “still contemplating their options.”

The closest grocery store is the Verona Giant Eagle, about a mile away.

Although other shopping options are nearby, the closing of the Oakmont Giant Eagle posed a challenge for the elderly.

“The sad thing about (the closing) is that Oakmont has an aging population,” Fescemyer said. “Many are on a fixed income and can’t drive.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.