ShareThis Page
Former Pa. Gov. Ridge says he can’t vote for Trump as GOP nominee |

Former Pa. Gov. Ridge says he can’t vote for Trump as GOP nominee

If Donald Trump wins the Republican nomination for president, former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge said Monday he would stay home rather than support his party’s candidate.

“It may be the first presidential election I don’t vote,” Ridge told the Tribune-Review. “I think he’s an embarrassment to my party, I think he’s an embarrassment to the country, and I can’t vote for him today, tomorrow or ever.”

Ridge, a Republican who was elected to two terms as governor before serving as the first Secretary of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush, said he plans to be in New Hampshire before that state’s Feb. 9 primary to show his support for former Florida governor Jeb Bush.

Asked whether he would support an independent run by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Ridge declined to comment.

Ridge said he could not vote for former First Lady and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton if she wins the Democratic nomination and is opposed by Trump.

“She’s about as flawed as they come,” Ridge said, citing Clinton’s problems with routing top secret email communications through a private computer server at her home.

Ridge spoke to the Trib before appearing at Carnegie Mellon University for the Cyburgh, PA 2016 Initiative hosted by the Pittsburgh Technology Council and CMU’s Software Engineering Institute.

Andrew Conte is an investigative reporter for the Tribune-Review. Reach him at [email protected] or 412-320-7835.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.