ShareThis Page
Former police officer sentenced in drug case |

Former police officer sentenced in drug case

| Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:00 a.m

A former municipal police officer from Washington County who resigned after being charged with heroin possession has been sentenced to house arrest.

Joseph H. Impiccini Jr., 27, of 75 Low Hill Road, Centerville, was a corporal on Centerville’s police force. The state Attorney General’s Office filed charges on Sept. 11, 2003.

According to court documents, the state investigation began after Impiccini got into an auto accident while on duty in May 2003. A report filed by Agent John J. Kaminsky states Impiccini requested medical leave from the department to go into a drug rehabilitation program after the crash.

State agents later determined that Impiccini was buying heroin from a house in the Fayette County community of Keisterville, Menallen Township. He was arrested during a sting operation on Sept. 4, 2003, and charged with possessing 20 packets of heroin.

Fayette County Judge John F. Wagner Jr. sentenced Impiccini to 23 months of intermediate punishment, a form of probation. The sentencing order states Impiccini’s first 180 days will be spent on house arrest, but he has been given credit for 48 days spent in drug rehabilitation.

The sentence reflects the terms of a plea bargain Impiccini entered into on July 27.

Impiccini resigned from the Centerville police force after his arrest.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.