ShareThis Page
Former professor gets Dem nod to seek Orie seat |

Former professor gets Dem nod to seek Orie seat

| Thursday, June 7, 2012 9:10 p.m

Democratic Party leaders from Allegheny and Butler counties have picked a former university professor who owns a consulting business to run in a special election this summer for the state Senate seat formerly held by Jane Orie.

Sharon Brown, 59, of McCandless, was the only candidate seeking her party’s endorsement for the Aug. 7 special election, said Grant Gittlen, executive director of the Allegheny County Democratic Committee.

The committees voted for Brown during a meeting on Thursday evening at the Cranberry Public Library.

Brown has a doctorate in public health and epidemiology from the University of California, Irvine, and previously worked as a nursing education professor. Since 2006, she has operated a small business that provides consulting services to health and educational programs.

“I am honored to have the endorsement of the Allegheny & Butler County Democratic committees,” Brown said in a news release. “I look forward to working with them to ensure the residents of the 40th District have a senator who works hard to ensure our children have a good education, our economy is vibrant, and our most vulnerable citizens are represented.”

The Senate district covers much of northern Allegheny and southern Butler counties. Voter registration in the district heavily favors the GOP.

Brown was defeated by state Rep. Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods, in 2010.

Republicans plan to pick a candidate to challenge Brown at a meeting scheduled for June 16.

Orie, 50, was sentenced Monday to serve 2 12 to 10 years in prison. An Allegheny County jury convicted her of using state workers to perform political work.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.