ShareThis Page
Four new suspects charged in massacre |

Four new suspects charged in massacre

The Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA (AP) – Authorities charged four new suspects Tuesday in the massacre of seven people in a drug den, and now say one of the worst mass murders in city history might have been caused by an argument over a car.

Four other men were cleared in June, just before going to trial in the December 2000 “Lex Street massacre.” Authorities initially believed the slaying was meant to wipe out rival drug dealers.

The victims, ranging in age from 15 to 54, were fatally shot and three others wounded after a group of masked men stormed into a West Philadelphia crack house. The attackers herded the 10 occupants into a room, ordered them to lie face-down on the floor and opened fire.

The initial suspects were jailed for 18 months awaiting trial on murder charges. But in June, with a jury already selected, new evidence surfaced indicating the wrong men were in custody, and prosecutors – who had sought the death penalty – dropped the charges.

“We regret very much the fact that four other people were charged in this case,” District Attorney Lynne Abraham said Tuesday.

But she continued to defend the handling of the case by her office and the police department, saying authorities moved quickly once their mistake became apparent.

The city faces at least one lawsuit.

“It was outrageous. These young men were just about facing the firing squad and the only reason they weren’t killed is the guns misfired,” said Nino Tinari, the attorney for Hezekiah Thomas, 25, who plans to sue the city over his ordeal.

Abraham on Tuesday announced murder charges against Shihe Black, 20; Bruce Veney, 26; Dawud Faruqi, 27; and his brother Khalid Faruqi, 26. Abraham said she was considering whether to seek the death penalty. All four men are in custody in unrelated cases; it wasn’t immediately clear whether they had attorneys.

“It was apparently a dispute over a car,” Abraham said.

According to an arrest affidavit, Veney told police he and the other suspects drove to the house to rob one of the victims, George Gibson, 18.

But Black offered a different account, allegedly telling police the shootings stemmed from a dispute over a blown clutch. Black said he had traded his Chevrolet Corsica and $300 for Gibson’s Dodge Intrepid; in turn, Black gave the Intrepid to Dawud Faruqi in exchange for a Glock pistol. When the Corsica’s clutch “went bad,” Gibson demanded his Intrepid back, leading to an argument with Dawud Faruqi, according to arrest papers.

Later, the four suspects went to the crack house, and Dawud Faruqi began shooting after his mask fell off, court documents said.

“Black stated that Dawud started shooting, and then everybody started shooting,” the documents said.

Defense attorneys for the four men who were cleared accused police of ignoring Black’s confession. But Abraham said that police originally dismissed the confession because he had recanted it and because one of the surviving shooting victims had implicated one of the initial suspects.

The original charges were based partly on a confession from Jermel Lewis, 25, who allegedly said the motive was to wipe out rival drug dealers. Lewis later said his statement was coerced, a charge disputed by police.

“He wasn’t coerced. He wasn’t beaten. He wasn’t browbeaten,” Police Commissioner Sylvester Johnson said Tuesday.

Besides Lewis and Thomas, the other cleared men are Quiante Perrin, 20, and Sacon Youk, 21.

“There were harsh statements made by the prosecutors when these guys were facing death. Nobody ever apologized to these guys and no one even admitted they were wrong,” said Youk’s attorney, Tariq El-Shabazz.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.